~Dr.NSR
12-17-2007, 08:04 PM
While Xcine needs no introduction, I do want to state that Xcine's is the prototypical face of factionalism. I assume you already know that the consequences of Xcine's splenetic doctrines, particularly from a moral point of view, are not favorable, but I have something more important to tell you. She should hide her head in shame before the judgment of future generations, whose tongue it will no longer be possible to stop and which, therefore, will say what today all of us know to be true: She wants to formulate social policies and action programs based on the most illiberal sorts of materialism in existence. It gets better: She actually believes that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem. I guess no one's ever told her that she is like a pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between Xcine and a pigeon is that Xcine intends to erase the memory of all traditions and all history. That's why some people are responsible and others are not. Xcine falls into the category of "not".
No one likes being attacked by uninformed guttersnipes. Even worse, Xcine exploits our fear of those attacks -- which she claims will evolve as soon as our backs are turned into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks -- as a pretext to lower our standard of living. If you think that's scary, then you should remember that I would like to give you an example of how recalcitrant Xcine can be. Xcine has admitted that she intends to smear people of impeccable character and reputation. Okay, that may have been a particularly bald-faced and unsubtle example but the central paradox of Xcine's communications, the twist that makes Xcine's claims so irresistible to blinkered, twisted New Age oligarchs, is that these people truly believe that five-crystal orgone generators can eliminate mind-control energies that are being radiated from secret, underground, government facilities. Xcine's gofers have been arrested in numerous murders, violent assaults, and bank robberies across the nation. The best example of this, culled from many, would have to be the time Xcine tried to toss sops to the egos of the slaphappy. Her criticisms of my letters have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, Xcine's criticisms are based solely on her emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in her "I think … I believe … I feel" game.
I am unmistakably not up on the latest gossip. Still, I have heard people say that Xcine's campaigns are a veritable dictionary and synonymicon of imperialism. Xcine may mean well but purists may object to my failure to present specific examples of her crass, adversarial insinuations. Fortunately, I do have an explanation for this omission. The explanation demands an understanding of how it takes more than a mass of uncompromising, vainglorious authoritarians to push the envelope on our knowledge of the world around us. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to tackle the multinational death machine that Xcine is currently constructing.
Xcine's shell games symbolize lawlessness, violence, and misguided rebellion -- extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest of us lose more than a little freedom. Xcine once had the audacity to tell me that merit is adequately measured by her methods and qualifications. My riposte was that several things she has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of hers that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how the world's salvation comes from whims, irrationality, and delusions.
If you think that Xcine knows the "right" way to read Plato, Maimonides, and Machiavelli, then think again. What's more, her accusations represent a backward step of hundreds of years, a backward step into a chasm with no bottom save the endless darkness of death. I will not quibble with Xcine as to whether or not she, perhaps more than anyone, should take seriously the challenge to explain a few facets of this confusing world around us. Instead, I'll simply state that Xcine is leading us down a slippery slope of economic strife, social turmoil, cultural chaos, and semi-intelligible cannibalism and leave it at that. She says that she can absorb mana by devouring her nemeses' brains. Wow! Isn't that like hiding the stolen goods in the closet and, when the cops come in, standing in front of the closet door and exclaiming, "They're not in here!"?
Having endured countless hours of listening to Xcine's intemperate, grumpy gibber, I can say with confidence that she cannot tolerate the world as it is. She needs to live in a world of fantasies. To be more specific, Xcine's statements such as "Society is supposed to be lenient towards the most selfish know-nothings I've ever seen" indicate that we're not all looking at the same set of facts. Fortunately, these facts are easily verifiable with a trip to the library by any open and honest individual. Far too many people tolerate Xcine's rejoinders as long as they're presented in small, seemingly harmless doses. What these people fail to realize, however, is that I welcome Xcine's comments. However, Xcine needs to realize that she really struck a nerve with me when she said that "metanarratives" are the root of tyranny, lawlessness, overpopulation, racial hatred, world hunger, disease, and rank stupidity. That lie is a painful reminder that it's possible that Xcine doesn't realize this because she has been ingrained with so much of plagiarism's propaganda. If that's the case, I recommend that we halt the destructive process that is carrying our civilization toward extinction.
I might be able to forgive Xcine, but only if she promises never again to interfere with a person's work performance, bodily security, physical movement, and privacy rights. I apologize if the following points are hard to follow but they're quite relevant to the gist of my argument. First, we must stick to our guns and not let Xcine convince us that a book of her writings would be a good addition to the Bible. And second, even without making an ethical argument against ethnocentrism, I can show that she needs to come to terms with her intransigent past. All of this means, of course, that she truly believes that she is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha. It is just such two-faced megalomania, unimaginative egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs Xcine to slander those who are most systematically undervalued, underpaid, underemployed, underfinanced, underinsured, underrated, and otherwise underserved and undermined as undeserving and underclass. What kind of loser wants to commit senseless acts of violence against anyone daring to challenge her snivelling scribblings? A loser like Xcine.
Xcine pompously claims that the only way to expand one's mind is with drugs -- or maybe even chocolate. That sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately. To pick an obvious but often overlooked example, if it were up to her, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism.
Xcine argues that she is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: Her wisecracks are not witty satire, as Xcine would have you believe. They're simply the exploitative, lousy ramblings of someone who has no idea or appreciation of what she's mocking. We must fight her hammer and tong. By "we", I mean all the hundreds of thousands who fundamentally long for the same thing without, as individuals, finding the words to describe outwardly what they inwardly visualize.
Call me a cynic, but I try never to argue with Xcine because it's clear she's not susceptible to reason. I repeat: Her peons remain largely silent when asked about the correlative connecting her to academicism. The rare times they do deign to comment they invariably skew the issue to prevent people from realizing that Xcine insists that honor counts for nothing. How can she be so blind? Very easily. Basically, Xcine says that the rules don't apply to her. You know, I don't think I have heard a less factually based statement in my entire life. To Xcine, alcoholism is a kind of religion. Period, finis, and Q.E.D.
No one likes being attacked by uninformed guttersnipes. Even worse, Xcine exploits our fear of those attacks -- which she claims will evolve as soon as our backs are turned into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks -- as a pretext to lower our standard of living. If you think that's scary, then you should remember that I would like to give you an example of how recalcitrant Xcine can be. Xcine has admitted that she intends to smear people of impeccable character and reputation. Okay, that may have been a particularly bald-faced and unsubtle example but the central paradox of Xcine's communications, the twist that makes Xcine's claims so irresistible to blinkered, twisted New Age oligarchs, is that these people truly believe that five-crystal orgone generators can eliminate mind-control energies that are being radiated from secret, underground, government facilities. Xcine's gofers have been arrested in numerous murders, violent assaults, and bank robberies across the nation. The best example of this, culled from many, would have to be the time Xcine tried to toss sops to the egos of the slaphappy. Her criticisms of my letters have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, Xcine's criticisms are based solely on her emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in her "I think … I believe … I feel" game.
I am unmistakably not up on the latest gossip. Still, I have heard people say that Xcine's campaigns are a veritable dictionary and synonymicon of imperialism. Xcine may mean well but purists may object to my failure to present specific examples of her crass, adversarial insinuations. Fortunately, I do have an explanation for this omission. The explanation demands an understanding of how it takes more than a mass of uncompromising, vainglorious authoritarians to push the envelope on our knowledge of the world around us. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to tackle the multinational death machine that Xcine is currently constructing.
Xcine's shell games symbolize lawlessness, violence, and misguided rebellion -- extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest of us lose more than a little freedom. Xcine once had the audacity to tell me that merit is adequately measured by her methods and qualifications. My riposte was that several things she has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of hers that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how the world's salvation comes from whims, irrationality, and delusions.
If you think that Xcine knows the "right" way to read Plato, Maimonides, and Machiavelli, then think again. What's more, her accusations represent a backward step of hundreds of years, a backward step into a chasm with no bottom save the endless darkness of death. I will not quibble with Xcine as to whether or not she, perhaps more than anyone, should take seriously the challenge to explain a few facets of this confusing world around us. Instead, I'll simply state that Xcine is leading us down a slippery slope of economic strife, social turmoil, cultural chaos, and semi-intelligible cannibalism and leave it at that. She says that she can absorb mana by devouring her nemeses' brains. Wow! Isn't that like hiding the stolen goods in the closet and, when the cops come in, standing in front of the closet door and exclaiming, "They're not in here!"?
Having endured countless hours of listening to Xcine's intemperate, grumpy gibber, I can say with confidence that she cannot tolerate the world as it is. She needs to live in a world of fantasies. To be more specific, Xcine's statements such as "Society is supposed to be lenient towards the most selfish know-nothings I've ever seen" indicate that we're not all looking at the same set of facts. Fortunately, these facts are easily verifiable with a trip to the library by any open and honest individual. Far too many people tolerate Xcine's rejoinders as long as they're presented in small, seemingly harmless doses. What these people fail to realize, however, is that I welcome Xcine's comments. However, Xcine needs to realize that she really struck a nerve with me when she said that "metanarratives" are the root of tyranny, lawlessness, overpopulation, racial hatred, world hunger, disease, and rank stupidity. That lie is a painful reminder that it's possible that Xcine doesn't realize this because she has been ingrained with so much of plagiarism's propaganda. If that's the case, I recommend that we halt the destructive process that is carrying our civilization toward extinction.
I might be able to forgive Xcine, but only if she promises never again to interfere with a person's work performance, bodily security, physical movement, and privacy rights. I apologize if the following points are hard to follow but they're quite relevant to the gist of my argument. First, we must stick to our guns and not let Xcine convince us that a book of her writings would be a good addition to the Bible. And second, even without making an ethical argument against ethnocentrism, I can show that she needs to come to terms with her intransigent past. All of this means, of course, that she truly believes that she is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha. It is just such two-faced megalomania, unimaginative egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs Xcine to slander those who are most systematically undervalued, underpaid, underemployed, underfinanced, underinsured, underrated, and otherwise underserved and undermined as undeserving and underclass. What kind of loser wants to commit senseless acts of violence against anyone daring to challenge her snivelling scribblings? A loser like Xcine.
Xcine pompously claims that the only way to expand one's mind is with drugs -- or maybe even chocolate. That sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately. To pick an obvious but often overlooked example, if it were up to her, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism.
Xcine argues that she is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: Her wisecracks are not witty satire, as Xcine would have you believe. They're simply the exploitative, lousy ramblings of someone who has no idea or appreciation of what she's mocking. We must fight her hammer and tong. By "we", I mean all the hundreds of thousands who fundamentally long for the same thing without, as individuals, finding the words to describe outwardly what they inwardly visualize.
Call me a cynic, but I try never to argue with Xcine because it's clear she's not susceptible to reason. I repeat: Her peons remain largely silent when asked about the correlative connecting her to academicism. The rare times they do deign to comment they invariably skew the issue to prevent people from realizing that Xcine insists that honor counts for nothing. How can she be so blind? Very easily. Basically, Xcine says that the rules don't apply to her. You know, I don't think I have heard a less factually based statement in my entire life. To Xcine, alcoholism is a kind of religion. Period, finis, and Q.E.D.