Blue Bird
06-20-2007, 12:46 PM
I recently did a review on a tag back when i joined a GFX forum, the tag pic is gone but its a great review. It would be better for you to see it but Oh well sorry guys.
Hello i will be doing a review on this tag, you are lucky because this is my very first review one a tag here at spr enjoy.
1.Flow
The Flow in this signature isn't very good because of the splatter brushes but i do like how you have blurred the sides because it makes a very good signature look even better. Anthor thing is to sharpen the focal(render) because it makes it look good aswell, remember this next time when making a tag.
2.Signature Size
The signature size i like, reason being the render fits well and you have fitted in heaps more effects, but there are a number of diffrent sizes, so when making tags try to mix it up abit. Such as have one signature with the size like this sig, and anthor with a diffrent one, mixes them up abit and people don't get bored.
3.Render or stock usage
As i said in the above you got a good render/stock to go with the signature size, so very nice placement of the render/stock, it doesn't take up much room, and that means that you can fit more effects in to make a good signature, just a tip don't overcrowed the signature with effects though.
4.Blending
I Don't really have to say much about ther blending because it is very good and i have no problem with it, good job on this.
5.Text
Now people may say text/words on a signature isn't important but it is, in this signature you need to actually get a better color to do the signature with reason being is that you can really see it so next time try to pcik a little lighter color, other then that nice job.
6.color
ok sorry to say this but i don't like the color, thats all i can say, sorry buddy try to put abit more effort into the colors on the signature :)
7.lighting
got nothing to say about this, very nice work on the lighting.
8.Signature Rating
This is the moment of truth mate. (Signature rating copied from www.gamereplays.org)
A signature of decent quality where the general criteria have been considered, the artist shows understanding of the Photoshop tools more so than lower ratings. The proportions are generally good and accurate yet there is room for improvement. Originality does not apply at this current rating, the artist may attempt to produce unique effects but proves to be unsuccessful. The flow of the signature is of a decent standard yet improvements can be made.[list]
Signature proportions have been considered and of an average standard
Stock/Render proportions are good and focused, the stock is appropriately placed
The text fulfills the criteria - colour, size and placement are good. Font Style will 'work' with the signature
Overall blending of signature is competent but can be improved in particular areas
Colour selection is good for all aspects of the signature but could be improved
Lighting techniques are of an average standard
Signature Rating (6)
very nice sig buddy keep up the good work.
This Tag/signature has been reviewed by .xsistence
Hello i will be doing a review on this tag, you are lucky because this is my very first review one a tag here at spr enjoy.
1.Flow
The Flow in this signature isn't very good because of the splatter brushes but i do like how you have blurred the sides because it makes a very good signature look even better. Anthor thing is to sharpen the focal(render) because it makes it look good aswell, remember this next time when making a tag.
2.Signature Size
The signature size i like, reason being the render fits well and you have fitted in heaps more effects, but there are a number of diffrent sizes, so when making tags try to mix it up abit. Such as have one signature with the size like this sig, and anthor with a diffrent one, mixes them up abit and people don't get bored.
3.Render or stock usage
As i said in the above you got a good render/stock to go with the signature size, so very nice placement of the render/stock, it doesn't take up much room, and that means that you can fit more effects in to make a good signature, just a tip don't overcrowed the signature with effects though.
4.Blending
I Don't really have to say much about ther blending because it is very good and i have no problem with it, good job on this.
5.Text
Now people may say text/words on a signature isn't important but it is, in this signature you need to actually get a better color to do the signature with reason being is that you can really see it so next time try to pcik a little lighter color, other then that nice job.
6.color
ok sorry to say this but i don't like the color, thats all i can say, sorry buddy try to put abit more effort into the colors on the signature :)
7.lighting
got nothing to say about this, very nice work on the lighting.
8.Signature Rating
This is the moment of truth mate. (Signature rating copied from www.gamereplays.org)
A signature of decent quality where the general criteria have been considered, the artist shows understanding of the Photoshop tools more so than lower ratings. The proportions are generally good and accurate yet there is room for improvement. Originality does not apply at this current rating, the artist may attempt to produce unique effects but proves to be unsuccessful. The flow of the signature is of a decent standard yet improvements can be made.[list]
Signature proportions have been considered and of an average standard
Stock/Render proportions are good and focused, the stock is appropriately placed
The text fulfills the criteria - colour, size and placement are good. Font Style will 'work' with the signature
Overall blending of signature is competent but can be improved in particular areas
Colour selection is good for all aspects of the signature but could be improved
Lighting techniques are of an average standard
Signature Rating (6)
very nice sig buddy keep up the good work.
This Tag/signature has been reviewed by .xsistence